Skip to content

Philosophics

Socio-political philosophical musings

  • Home
  • 🜏 The Anti-Enlightenment Project
    • Agency
    • Quotes
  • Weasel Words
  • Modernity Worldview
  • About this blog
    • Contact

Tag: Ballard’s critique of modern society

Ballard Was Already Logged In: Social Media as Digital High-Rise

Jun 23, 2025Jun 24, 2025Posted in fiction, modernism, philosophy, podcast, politics, psychology, societyTagged algorithmic feedback loop, architecture and identity, Ballard and technology, Ballard social media, Ballard's critique of modern society, Ballardian entropy, business, Crash Ballard analysis, curated identity, digital dystopia, digital-marketing, feedback loops and desire, High-Rise as metaphor, High-Rise novel, identity crisis, Instagram performativity, isolation in digital age, J.G. Ballard, libidinal economy, marketing, philosophy, social media, social media as architecture, structural violence, Twitter rage cultureLeave a comment

J.G. Ballard didn’t predict social media. He vivisected it in advance, then left the carcass twitching under fluorescent light. Before Zuckerberg was a glint in a dorm room’s databank, Ballard had already mapped the pathology of curated identity, algorithmic libido, and digital entropy. If the elevator shaft in High-Rise had Wi-Fi, we’d be exactly where we are now.

Audio: NotebookLM podcast on this topic.

Ballard’s tower blocks are not housing. They are autonomous systems masquerading as communities, structural cathedrals to hierarchy and isolation. Inhabitants lived stacked, surveilled, and increasingly feral – yet always convinced of their own civility, their own curated status within the glass cathedral. This is LinkedIn with plumbing. Instagram with broken lifts. X/Twitter if the blue ticks started eating each other.

“The more they came to know one another, the more they learned to isolate themselves.”

That’s not a punchline. That’s the algorithm.

Social media promised connection. What it delivered was exhaustion, identity theatre, and infinite scroll. Like the tenants of Ballard’s high-rise, we don’t talk – we perform. Not to each other, but at each other. Aesthetic becomes ontology. Feedback becomes affect. The timeline is just a corridor of muttered threats and filtered selfies, looping like CCTV.

And then there’s Crash. Forget the pornographic collisions – what matters is the feedback loop. The same compulsion. The same eroticised machinery. Each car crash intensifies the desire for the next, not in spite of the trauma, but because of it. This is Twitter rage. This is comment-section flame wars. This is the libidinal economy of attention.

Ballard understood: systems don’t collapse after they fail. They fail by design. His buildings, like our platforms, are monuments to their own disintegration. The only thing more artificial than the community is the performance of self within it.

You don’t live on the platform. The platform lives through you.

So yes, Ballard was already online. He logged in through the service entrance, weaponised the feedback loop, and left us with a diagnosis masquerading as fiction. What we mistook for dystopia was, as always, autobiography.

Welcome to the high-rise. Comments disabled.

Tags

agency ai Anti-Enlightenment art artificial intelligence book books capitalism ChatGPT cognitive bias communication consciousness critical theory critique culture democracy determinism economics enlightenment Enlightenment critique epistemology ethics existentialism fiction Foucault freedom free will Generative AI god history humour Iain McGilchrist identity justice language language insufficiency Language Insufficiency Hypothesis law life logic metaphysics Midjourney modernism Modernity morality music Nietzsche ontology perception perspective Philosophics blog philosophy philosophy of language podcast politics postmodernism power psychology rant rationality reality reason religion review rhetoric Ridley Park satire science self society technology truth video wittgenstein writing

Search

  1. microglyphics's avatar
    microglyphics on What the LIH Is Not About (And Why This Still Needs Saying)Dec 19, 2025

    Yes. Language and categories are left-hemisphere representation per McGilchrist's model. This hemispheric divide (metaphoric or otherwise) seems fairly obvious, and…

  2. nickdruryfad63dc877's avatar
    nickdruryfad63dc877 on What the LIH Is Not About (And Why This Still Needs Saying)Dec 19, 2025

    You might choose to say that LIH is saying that most people do not recognise that they are so-called "left…

  3. Unknown's avatar
    Cold, Grammar, and the Quiet Gatekeeping of Philosophy – Philosophics on Cold, Aliens, and the Grammar That Thinks It Knows Too MuchDec 19, 2025

    […] understood as something one performs rather than something one is. I spoke about this here and here. Indulge this…

  4. Unknown's avatar
    Cold, Grammar, and the Quiet Gatekeeping of Philosophy – Philosophics on When Aliens Speak English: The False Promise of Linguistic FamiliarityDec 19, 2025

    […] Or a name, understood as something one performs rather than something one is. I spoke about this here and…

  5. Unknown's avatar
    What the LIH Is Not About (And Why This Still Needs Saying) – Philosophics on Why We Keep Talking Past Each OtherDec 19, 2025

    […] common misperceptions I’ve already heard. Through this feedback, I now understand some of the underlying structural limitations that I…

Website Powered by WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Philosophics
    • Join 244 other subscribers.
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Philosophics
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar