The Matter with Things

Index and table of contents

People outside of this space have been suggesting that I read Iain McGilchrist. I started by watching his YouTube content, but I was put off by two things. But first, let me say that I really enjoy listening to Iain speak. He’s an Oxford psychiatrist and just a font of information—full of knowledge to retrieve and synthesise on a whim.

So what’s the problem? First, McGilchrist is a Panpsychist. And although Galen Strawson, whom I adore, is also a Panpsychist, I just don’t relate to the notion that everything has consciousness. I might be able to get there through semantic acrobatics, but that’s just a cheap parlour trick. I don’t mind engaging in idealists, as I am partial to Analytic Idealism, and I don’t mind saying there is a consciousness that we are all part of—though admittedly, I feel that this is just another parlour trick I am somehow more apt to forgive. I believe there is material and this material is what we can measure and try to measure, but ostensibly it’s merely a poor reflection of the larger reality that may be described alternatively as consciousness or information depending on which theory you support.

I said there are two problems. The second is less fundamental and more practical. His latest book release, The Matter with Things, is a two-volume set that costs around ÂŁ70 in Britain but is twice that in the US at around $150. Oh. And it’s almost 3,000 pages.

As it turns out, I’ve read the first two chapters. Some Preliminaries and Attention. So far, it’s been some setup and ground setting with some narratives about persons with split and damaged hemispheres in order to establish the relative function of each side of the human brain.

I am familiar with some of these case studies from other neuroscience literature I’ve read, but he has a nice way of expanding the narratives. Plus, he’s got some new ones.

I don’t expect that I’ll be documenting a play-by-play here, but I wanted to share what I am doing. I expect that the first volume will be more of the same. Perhaps the second volume will delve more into the metaphysical arena. Time will tell.

10 thoughts on “The Matter with Things

  1. As a materialist are you ready to define what the material is; what the material is assembled from? Is your apparition a composition of some sort of building block?
    Let’s say energy really does equal mass and visa versa. Beyond the Planck level as energy increases things should be getting bigger, no? But as we see smaller and smaller we find higher levels of energy and it takes an enormous amount of energy to crack it open. You need a quantum sledgehammer? We’re having a sale…

    Like

    1. Since I wrote this post, I’ve adopted the position of Analytical Idealism. I’ve always been challenged by the human inaccessibility of the ‘material’ that makes up ‘reality’. I still feel that this reality is inaccessible, but now I assert that material is a convenient fiction.

      If I order a quantum sledgehammer by midnight tonight, do I get a set of Ginsu knives?

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment