<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://philosophics.blog/2026/05/06/language-is-not-the-bridge/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Philosophics</news:name><news:language>en-gb</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-07T00:09:06+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Language Is Not the Bridge</news:title><news:keywords>philosophy, language, ontology, critique, semantics, metaphor, systems, Language Insufficiency Hypothesis, substack, compression, lossy compression, presumption gap</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://philosophics.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/composed-55.jpeg?w=120</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://philosophics.blog/2026/05/05/free-speech-pseudo-invariance-and-the-grammar-of-liberal-rights-part-1/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Philosophics</news:name><news:language>en-gb</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-06T03:15:55+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Free Speech, Pseudo-Invariance, and the Grammar of Liberal Rights &#8211; Part 1</news:title><news:keywords>philosophy, video, language, critique, society, freedom, free speech, podcast, essay, Language Insufficiency Hypothesis, essentially contested concepts, category error, positive freedom, negative freedom, freedom to, freedom from</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://philosophics.blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ea32e310-a084-48cd-8442-121b6a703d73.jpeg?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
